Editorial by Dan Webber
President Obama’s mendacious political promise, “If you like
your health care plan, you can keep it,” continues to cast a long and
disturbing shadow of doubt and confusion over millions of Americans who have
lost coverage as a result of Obamacare. As 2014 unfolds, the most vulnerable
senior citizens — those who receive home health care services — are about to
learn they are out of luck. Obamacare
opens a trap door under them, leaving this elderly population in freefall —
with many citizens losing access to home health care.
Add another compelling reason to reverse Obamacare. Whether
by accident or intention, the “Affordable Care Act” empirically strips
America’s oldest and poorest cohort, all part of the World War II generation,
of this basic coverage. Here is how.
On Jan. 1, Medicare’s home
health care services, formerly serving 3.5 million elderly beneficiaries
across the country, were cut under Obamacare. The cut deleted exactly 14
percent, or an estimated $22 billion, from these lowest-income Americans over
four years. News of the forthcoming cut only trickled out the Friday before
Thanksgiving, yet another stunning attempt by the Obama White House to reduce
Medicare benefits without attracting notice.
Guess what? We noticed. This cut does irreparable damage to
recipients of Medicare’s home health care services, those who are aged,
homebound and sicker than the average Medicare population. Indeed, nearly
two-thirds of Medicare home health care users live at or below the federal
poverty level, meaning they are the most economically compromised of America’s
precious senior citizens.
This cut is an indictment of White House policies. Home
health care agencies have always provided services to homebound Medicare
beneficiaries. No hoopla, but when these Americans needed skilled care, they
got it. In contrast to expensive hospital care, critical health care services
got into millions of American homes via clinicians. Home health care was — and
still is — vital. It is also now effectively gone for these Americans.
How did home health care save money for taxpayers? Using 2009 as a reference
year, Medicare’s average Part A and Part B payment for a home health care visit
was $145, compared to $373 per day in a skilled nursing facility or a whopping
$1,805 per day in a hospital. In addition, according to one leading expert,
skilled home health care services saved the Medicare program $2.8 billion
during the most recent three-year period. Approximately $670 million of that
savings is attributable to 20,000 fewer hospital readmissions.
Given these facts, one would conclude that the value of home
health care in driving down Medicare costs
should be obvious, if this — and not a single-payer system — were the
real goal of Obamacare. How did we lose sight of common sense? Just keep
patients in a familiar surrounding — their homes, not in an expensive hospital
— keep sound disease management programs that deliver better and more
cost-effective outcomes, and continue to coordinate care for patients. That was
working. Now we have the reverse — markedly higher medical and insurance costs,
with absolutely no institutional connection, support or continuing benefits for
these especially needy Americans, the ones who depended — with their families —
on critical home health care benefits. The president and his Democratic
surrogates in the House and Senate have done it again: They have wiped out
another critical, working system with this Obamacare monstrosity.
What else will this home health care cut achieve? It will
hit the small businesses that provide home health care nationwide, and is
already doing so. More than 90 percent of those providing home health care are
small businesses. According to the U.S. Center for Medicare and Medicaid
Services, 40 percent of these companies will be operating “at a loss” — that
is, they will likely fold or end up in bankruptcy — by 2017 as a result of the
cut. What does that mean? It means nearly 5,000 more Medicare home health care
providers may go out of business, and nearly 500,000 more jobs within this
flogged industry may be wiped out to fund
Obamacare. Those who care about such things should put that into their
future unemployment calculations — and then thank Mr. Obama and his
congressional friends, who all got a waiver and probably do not worry about
home health care anyway.
Attacking our weakest senior citizens is no way to run a
country. It is, in a word, reprehensible. This abomination devastates another
existing and essential Medicare promise, while throwing one more gut-wrenching
punch at this job sector. Does the truth no longer matter? Do these lives no
longer matter? Do these businesses and jobs no longer matter? When will Mr.
Obama and his allies in Congress let up and allow Americans to look after
themselves again, as we used to quite well?
Dan Weber is president and founder of the Association of
Mature American Citizens.
No comments:
Post a Comment